×
top 200 commentsshow all 203

[–]elebrin 214 points215 points  (2 children)

So the prostitutes are following the army around as always, then.

[–]Bouxxi 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I think the military is more interested in fucking

[–]Reasonable-Agent-278 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is true . There’s groupies near  almost every military base as well.   The really remote bases might not have groupies . You bet there’s prostitutes in the nearest city . They do part time work at minimum wage collect government benefits as much as possible then get cash from their customers. 

I never got into to it . The idea of banging some woman that just banged another guy is repulsive to me.But to each their own . 

I know there’s a lot of Ukrainian and Russian women on OLD and social media looking for western men to help them become  residents of western countries.  

Be very carful if you meet one .  Ask lots of questions and do not offer any assistance or let her live with you . Thats asking for trouble. 

[–]eternal_kvitka1817 141 points142 points  (11 children)

They should be mobilized to the frontline to avoid it, just like men.

[–]Golucky00 10 points11 points  (1 child)

forced draft is horrible, but drafting also women would mean they wouldnt have to draft goddamn grandpas.

[–]Alive-Stop9151 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Older people have been drafted more as well. Ukraine is in deep shit manpower wise more than western media admits

[–]Particular-Tap1211 69 points70 points  (5 children)

Never listen to government properganda. Equal rights = equal on the front line

[–]Front_Extension5988 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No man. I'm not getting killed for a woman unless she stays home. Placing a woman on the front lines is dangerous for all. It is distracting and they have hygene needs.

Let them use technology to fight at a distance if they must be drafted. That is the only place they could excel. Be honest about it.

A trained fit man will run her over without even noticing anything but her tits to stop him in his tracks.

[–]WeEatBabies 292 points293 points  (11 children)

"In Desperation, Scores of Ukrainian Women Turn to ‘Only Fans’ To Make Ends Meet"

In other words : "We don't have our slaves anymore, the state is having them die on the frontlines for us, and now we have to earn our own money and work!!!! :("

It's so unfair being a woman!!!

[–]avpd_squirrel 113 points114 points  (0 children)

Women most affected. Primary victims of war.

[–]eternal_kvitka1817 76 points77 points  (1 child)

They should be mobilized to the frontline to avoid it, just like men.

[–]Reasonable-Agent-278 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I didn’t know that  masturbating or as the case may be fucking is worse than getting shot and blown up.  I guess I should be thankful that I got shot three times and my IFC blown up by a IED .  I didn’t have to jerk off or  fuck to get paid. 

The insanity and hypocrisy never stops.

Take the reporter to the front lines and make them look at the casualties after a artillery bombardment , missile strike or a fire fight with armor , machine guns ,  mobile artillery, mines, and snipers. It’s a fucking laugh a minute. Assholes .  

Of course men are the primary victims of war . Do they think those weapons fire themselves? 

Who do they think is getting shot at , hiding in filthy trenches during the day so they are not seen and don’t get hit by artillery and missiles.  Who do they think is freezing and eating miserable rations while all hell is breaking loose .  

That people believe feminists os insane.  I know the  media censors video and pictures . They don’t show the horrific wounds, the chaos that is combat . Maybe some guy firing a machine gun in video taken by another solider.  You  don’t see the living conditions , the trauma and psychological damage. 

But fucking and masturbating on OF is worse ! They chose to leave and go to a safe country. They don’t like the low paying jobs that are available. Oh no they have to work snd do things like housekeeping in hotels, waitstaff at restaurant.  Well what were they expecting a government funded life of luxury. I know government assistance in most EU countries is far more generous than the US .  They don’t have to be OF ahem laugh “ content creators “ . I didn’t know having sex and or masturbating was creating content. 

What are the men who are legally unable to flee doing. Getting shot at and worse. But at least their not  on OF fucking and or masturbating for a price.   

[–]Current_Finding_4066 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I am sure it is not fun for women either.

But lack of interest in men losing their lives, or forcing them back to Ukraine to fight shown as moral, while overblowing issues women are facing is really tiring.

[–][deleted] 146 points147 points  (44 children)

Im gay but if I were a straight guy I’d never pay money to see these lazy women who want to profit off men’s desperation. My gayness renders women powerless to scam me for cash. Just watch porn guys it’s free online. Don’t pay. Women think porn is degrading or is it now empowering? Not sure the messaging is clear.

Unlike feminist types l claim there is a double standard and some of it makes sense. I think porn is degrading often for women: getting gang banged and cummed on your face by 20 dudes isn’t empowering. Ask a woman in bukkake and gang bangs how she feels about her life and it won’t be good. Porn isn't an industry that no one, male or female, should aspire to be in, it's rife with actual anti women (and anti men) stuff, drugs, severe abuse issues, and criminality. Do I watch it? Of course. Am I obsessed with it? No. Do I glamorize it? No, I think you have to feel badly for anyone who decides they need to make money that way; being treated as a piece of disposable meat instead of using their skills, talent and education.

[–]Mysterious-Citron875 38 points39 points  (12 children)

Now porn search results is filled with trans and gay content even tho I don't ask for it

[–]BogdanPradatu 5 points6 points  (1 child)

clean up your cookies :))

[–]Mysterious-Citron875 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The same bullshit a lot of people says. It has nothing do with cookies, but with the new google algorithm.

I literally got my new gaming PC a week ago and nothing has changed.

[–]ArtifactFan65 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Working in a cubicle all day is also degrading to a lot of people. So is doing gruelling manual labor and permanently damaging your body.

Work isn't meant to be easy, I guess it's empowering to choose the type of work I want to do though.

[–]elebrin 2 points3 points  (9 children)

Well, this is about OF and that's porn that you pay for. In some regard, it's safer for both the women and the men because nobody's getting STDs through a video camera.

Personally I have no problem with it whatsoever - but we need to accept it for what it is, set some rules, and keep it safe for everyone.

The main issue I have with OF is it allows the watchers to donate whatever amount they want, with no ceiling. I think that there should be a monthly max payment.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Getting your cock sucked is low risk. Not no risk. But low risk. I’m in healthcare / medicine and can say this with certainty.

[–]elebrin 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I mean you don't know who you are dealing with and she could bite your cock off. I wouldn't trust a random person like that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Sounds like an irrational fear to actually getting your cock blown. Sorry that’s not a thing. I get sucked regularly never had it bit never had an sti

[–]elebrin 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Well, I am married, and I'm not willing to talk about my sexual experiences publicly on the internet.

Suffice to say, the key words here are "random person." Sexual contact of any sort requires true trust. There is nothing wrong with a blowjob, but there are a lot of dangers in sexual contact between people who functionally have no reason to trust each other.

Sex cannot be casual. If you think that it can be and you are having sex casually, then you are ignorant, willfully or otherwise. Managing the risk requires a fully vetted, trusting relationship that a casual encounter cannot grant.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Ok you’re married. I never ever said people should break their commitment to a monogamous relationship. There is absolutely NO reason why people can’t have non monogamous casual sex if that’s what they want.

Speaking as a gay guy you’re just wrong. People hook up casually on grindr and apps and straight people do it too. There are risks with anything just take calculated ones. Getting head is a low risk activity. I happen to be in a monogamous long term relationship and plan to stay that way. I’ve also had plenty of hookups in the past, and that’s fine. That’s my choice. Not anymore. Also my choice.

[–]elebrin -1 points0 points  (3 children)

I disagree. I personally would never have sex outside of a committed relationship. I wouldn't say marriage is mandatory (it's not a bad idea to ensure sexual compatibility during an extended engagement period, which my wife and I did) but I would encourage people to do most of the sort of pre-marriage vetting before sex: agree to be monogamous at least temporarily, meet family and friends to vet someone's trust-ability, be socially introduced as a couple so others understand your monogamous status, spend extended periods of time together, go over the finances, go over family intentions and backup plans in case someone gets pregnant or sick, and generally set expectations for how the relationship will work.

Having the community's blessing for the relationship is absolutely vital as well, because taking that step has two benefits: first, everyone knows that you are attached, and if your significant other is approached for sex then that person needs to be managed. Second, community acceptance means a lower likelihood that one of your significant other's friends or family members will manipulate your significant other into claims of rape or sexual assault/abuse. If Mom and Dad don't like you, it's time to take a step back, right? Having a person's community accept you as their sexual partner just reduces risks, and you can talk to them and look for reasons to trust or not to trust.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

“I personally would not”. Exactly. You. Personally. Not everyone is you. Not everyone wants a marriage or monogamous relationship. Not everyone is looking for that in this point in their lives. Some people are exploring their sexuality and that doesn’t mean they have a one size fits all leave it to beaver life.

Your post is dated. Community blessing? Are you Russian or something? I do not want the community blessing me. My marriage is between me and my partner. Everyone is different. If that’s what works for you, good for you. Don’t make it a prescription and one size fits all option as if it’s 1955.

[–]elebrin -1 points0 points  (1 child)

We used to do those things for a reason.

Let's talk consent. Instead of thinking of consent as a thing you ask for one time and then agree to, let's talk about the expectation of consent a concept. If a couple is known to the community and the parents of the couple are "good with it" and accept the relationship (blessing is just another way to say that), and the community in general knows about the relationship, then if someone cheats it's with the knowledge of everyone involved. False accusations are far harder to have gain traction, because again there is an expectation present.

One of the best ways to make sure you have the trust that consent relies upon and REALLY have it, every time, deeply from someone's core rather than simply their words, is to properly vet the person and have external acceptance.

The traditions behind my ideas are timeless. Monogamy and community acceptance are common threads to many cultures across the globe, and through time as well. I think they are correct. It's about safety and health. I think you do what you do at your peril, but your life is yours to live. All I can do is offer the same warning that has been passed down through the ages, to people who have always ignored it. Some people get lucky, but everyone who has had issues with infidelity or STDs or family drama around sexual partners has failed to heed that advice. Don't mess around with anyone unless you TRULY can trust them, because you understand what they want from the relationship.

Hell isn't some metaphysical place where you are tortured by devils; it's right here on Earth when you fuck up your own life. Hey, you have free will, do what you want. But don't be surprised when the bad shit comes your way.

[–]BogdanPradatu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You would actually be contributing to the war efforts, by paying the ukrainian only fans women. I mean, if they still live in Ukraine, that is, because they would spend that money there and help the economy.

[–]mcc9999 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They ARE using their skills and talent anyway. As to education: that's largely useless these days. If a woman has a hot body but an IQ of maybe 85, OF may well be her best option!

[–]kuzism 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Women have always made money in the sex industry, most average men have trouble meeting women and they are thirsty for sex.

[–][deleted] 71 points72 points  (19 children)

Disclaimer:

This is not meant to be a political post whatsoever, I personally support Ukraine and the same could be said about Russian women. They are not facing the consequences of the war as intensely as men, nor do they get drafted.

[–]SidewaysGiraffe 15 points16 points  (15 children)

Why on Earth do you support a country that's enslaving its own people?

Further, why do you say that after explicitly saying it's "not political"?

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points  (13 children)

Because they're on the right side of history and are allies to democracies.

And if your criticism of democracy has brought you to a point where you're wanting to see them lose to a dictatorship, you lost the plot a long time ago friend

[–]ParamedicExcellent15 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The right side of history just depends on who wins and who gets to write that history and circulate it

[–]ArtifactFan65 8 points9 points  (4 children)

What kind of democracy doesn't have elections?

[–]BogdanPradatu 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Are you talking about elections in Ukraine? What country at war has elections?

[–]Reasonable-Agent-278 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Isreal does . The US and Canada have held elections while at war . I believe Australia and New Zealand do also . Most EU nations will should they go to war .   

Being at war doesn’t preclude elections. 

[–]Reasonable-Agent-278 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Russian kind .  It’s been that wat for many thousands of years.  The US the world’s longest lasting Republic with elections is only 250 years old 

Russia is not a free country. Try criticism of the war or Putin there. It gets you a prison sentence. Who in their right mind supports that. 

The Russians are eventually going  all  but wipe out the male population. They have not learned  you don’t throw waves of infantry  at men with machine guns. They did that in WW 2 losing about 10 million men to the Wehrmacht   .  The Russian economy must be awful.  I saw pictures of rear echelon troops with WW2 era Mosin Nagants and some SU 100s or SU 122s dating back to the 1940s . Thats getting desperate.  The Soviets simply put all there armor and firearms into wharehouses . 

I would not want to be a Russian aged 16 - 70 .  They are subject to conscription. As are convicts. 

Thats really getting desperate for man power. Its also what tyrants do . 

[–]69PointstoSlytherin 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Democracies don't kidnap thousands of men off the streets to send to war.

[–]The_SHUN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have some news for you, Russia does it on a far larger scale and less regard to the well being of its men

[–]BogdanPradatu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unless it's necessary.

[–]The_SHUN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This, this war is one of the few wars where there is a clear good and bad side, and some people still choose to support the bad side, truly deplorable behaviour

[–]SidewaysGiraffe -5 points-4 points  (2 children)

History is written by the winners, "friend"- there IS no "right side".

Nor is Russia a dictatorship.

[–]MisanthropicHethen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Found the russian propaganda bot, or an idiot that drank the coolade.

[–]The_SHUN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Delusional, Russia IS a dictatorship and you will have to prove otherwise.

There is a right side, the Japanese and Nazis are objectively EVIL and you cannot justify otherwise.

[–]63daddy 27 points28 points  (3 children)

It seems to me any country that refuses to use half its available Human Resources shouldn’t receive any aid from other countries.

[–]drbirtles 30 points31 points  (43 children)

Is it controversial to say their must be a consumer of the content for it to be financially viable? Like... I hazard a guess it's 99% men that are buying it.

Maybe if we stopped...

[–]Sea2Chi 21 points22 points  (24 children)

Hell, if enough women wanted to pay to see average guys naked I'm pretty sure most of my guy friends would be talking about marketing, engagement, and retention rates the way they do fantasy football.

It's a supply and demand issue. Men want to see naked women so bad they'll pay for it even if that woman isn't that attractive. Whereas the market is so oversaturated with naked men that most guys can't even give it away for free.

[–]drbirtles -4 points-3 points  (23 children)

So why is OP complaining about something that financially makes sense in this dogs*it Economy, that is primarily driven by mens purchases.

Men create the demand.

[–]peter_venture 11 points12 points  (19 children)

There can't be a demand if there isn't a product. Of course this particular product will always be there. But what OP is saying is that while a war is going on and men are being forcibly conscripted and often being horribly injured or killed, women are free to roam the world and many choose OF while unencumbered by family responsibilities. Sure beats dying.

[–]calmly86 11 points12 points  (0 children)

“Sure beats dying.”

Yup, and it obviously beats doing ANY other possible job. We’ve had it beat into us over the past thirty-five years that “anything men can do, women can do better, and in heels.” Yet, I’m pretty sure women make up the vast minority of soldiers serving in Ukraine as well as the vast minority of casualties. We hear in the US, time and again that if we were invaded, we’d see the “protectiveness” of American “momma bears” and the reality is likely to be clearly different. Instead of fighting, Ukrainian women fled. Instead of working regular jobs and keeping faith with their countrymen, they’re choosing the easy path.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (7 children)

Did you just say there can't be a demand if there's no supply?

Did you learn about economics at Trump U?

[–]peter_venture -2 points-1 points  (6 children)

Poorly worded, I suppose. There wasn't a large demand for women to sell pictures of their assholes and such on the Internet until they started doing it. Sad men made this profitable for them, but that doesn't mean men are to blame for it. No one makes anyone do this. Blaming OF for women leaving Ukraine and doing this is saying they have no agency over their own actions.

[–]Down_D_Stairz 3 points4 points  (2 children)

While both are doing wrong, who is more in the wrong? The drug dealer or the one who buy drugs? And if you wanted this to stop, would you look at the consumer or the drug dealer?

[–]ArtifactFan65 5 points6 points  (1 child)

I'm not sure only fans is that much more immoral than a fast food worker making food for overweight people who are addicted, same as people who are producing alcohol or nicotine, junk food etc.

Many things are harmful if consumed in excess.

[–]BogdanPradatu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think excess sex is harmful. Well, unless it's really a lot, maybe. So OF might be better than junk food and alcohol, actually.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (3 children)

You’re oversimplifying things. A significant amount of men who use onlyfans have some kind of issue and are in a weak spot. A lot of them are depressed, lonely, or just seek company. You’ll never get rid of those issues, and OF preys on those people.

[–]drbirtles 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I know, I used to date a large UK based OF creator. The entire business model is based on predatory and legitimately fraudulent behaviours. You're never talking directly to the creator, you're talking to a hired team.

I understand completely how the game works. But we need to push the zeitgeist away from normalisation. Aka stop buying it.

[–]BogdanPradatu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be honest, those women in ukraine are also in a vulnerable position. Many of them wouldn't do it if it was a normal economy, probably.

[–]AmuseDeath 6 points7 points  (6 children)

You are absolutely right, but you're ignoring the context which is for Ukrainians, they are in a war right now. It just looks very bad for the men to be blown up to bits with rockets and gunfire, meanwhile their women are safe elsewhere making money for themselves. The men are giving up their lives for THEIR COUNTRY. The women are making money FOR THEMSELVES. One is selfless, the other is selfish.

Where are the feminists saying that women should EQUALLY serve the country by staying? Sure, they may not be best on the frontline, but what about support roles? Drone operators, supply truck drivers, medical roles, etc.

So yes, your point absolutely stands that OF works because of sad, desperate, thirsty men (who should honestly just watch porn and be done), but it is the context of the war that is the point.

[–]the_virginwhore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t think the women are making money for their country? People can only make money for themselves, but that doesn’t mean it stays with themselves after it’s made. Everything related to this situation costs money—you think that comes from nowhere? Who’s going to pay to take care of the people in Ukraine? To rebuild? To provide for injured and disabled soldiers? They need money, and the world’s “oldest profession” is one that women can adapt to the digital age to make money relatively quickly. When a country needs money, it seems perfectly patriotic to make money. You need a way to get money flowing into the system.

Also, evacuation of civilians is the best choice not only for the civilians but from a strategic perspective as well. You want people out of the way so you’re not worrying about them getting caught in the crossfire. Women who aren’t trained for the work shouldn’t just stay on principle because hashtagfeminism.

[–]drbirtles -3 points-2 points  (4 children)

Well there are women on the front line, and men that aren't (Obvs the numbers aren't anywhere near equal), however you could use the same argument for anyone who is safe and working any job for themselves. But for some reason OF is picked as the measure of inequality.

Also most Ukrainian women aren't doing OF so I suspect the reality of the situation isn't such a simple binary.

The reality is, OF is easy work. I think that's what truly bothers people. It's degrading yes, but easy. And men don't get the same opportunity to make tons of money doing shoving cucumbers up their butts... But again this is driven by male demand, so we created that inequality by being willing to pay for such material so readily.

[–]AmuseDeath 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Well there are women on the front line

Missing the trees for the forest. Taking exceptions and then minimizing the actual issue. Men are FORCED to stay in Ukraine. They have no choice. There was a mandated order where men of a certain age range are FORCED to be in the country and fight. The women that stayed back are first of all a minority and secondly, it is a VOLUNTARY choice for them. Please understand what the difference is.

But for some reason OF is picked as the measure of inequality.

Because if you can't put your body on the frontline, do something else about the war. If you are going to do OF, do OF FOR Ukraine. Use that OF money and donate that to the country to help your fellow men who are being slaughtered by Russians and North Koreans. You don't seem to understand what a privilege these women have it where they are not forced to fight and they are free to flee and act as if the war isn't a thing in their life. Wake up white knight.

I think that's what truly bothers people.

No what we're talking about here is the female privilege at play where the men are forced to stay, fight and die and the women have the freedom to flee and live elsewhere. You would assume rational human beings that do move away could do work such as OF and at least donate something to the cause, but that's not happening. We're merely bringing up the sheer selfishness of some of these women (not all, because we've already gone over the women that have VOLUNTARILY stayed back and helped the men in the country). In fact, ask the WOMEN in Ukraine who stayed back and helped what they think of the other women that are fleeing and doing OF for themselves. Ask them how they feel about these other women.

Ask women like these:

https://taskandpurpose.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/09/GettyImages-1237543519.jpg

[–]drbirtles 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Men are FORCED to stay in Ukraine. They have no choice. There was a mandated order where men of a certain age range are FORCED to be in the country and fight. The women that stayed back are first of all a minority and secondly, it is a VOLUNTARY choice for them. Please understand what the difference is.

I literally said in the last thread discussion I had on here multiple times how unfair it is that men have to fight. I said that exact thing. So you're not blowing anyones socks off with new information here. I mentioned the women serving only in response to your statement that:

"The men are giving up their lives for THEIR COUNTRY. The women are making money FOR THEMSELVES. One is selfless, the other is selfish. they may not be best on the frontline, but what about support roles? Drone operators, supply truck drivers, medical roles, etc"

Well some women are serving, That was the reason I mentioned it. Of course there could be more, but I don't think Ukraine is short of women that want to make a difference in whatever way they can. I don't see why there's any disagreement on this point.

Because if you can't put your body on the frontline, do something else about the war. If you are going to do OF, do OF FOR Ukraine. Use that OF money and donate that to the country to help your fellow men who are being slaughtered

Maybe some do, you have no idea. Also, most people, and most Ukrainian women will work for Ukraine. But just for the record, I actually know Ukrainian men who fled the country to avoid the draft. So, is that selfless? Or selfish? What have they done for Ukraine by fleeing? Ultimately, It's a massively complicated mess over there and this sub is mad about a tiny TINY portion of the population who makes porn.

My initial point was not about the morality of OF (or gender roles in conflict). My point was that the surge in OF creators is driven by Male demand. We actively encourage that industry to flourish. That was all I had to say. I had very little to say originally about where they spend that money blah blah.

You don't seem to understand what a privilege these women have it where they are not forced to fight and they are free to flee and act as if the war isn't a thing in their life. Wake up white knight.

Not white knighting, believe me! I understand how society favours women at times, but I try to balance that understanding with times it favours men. However war ain't one of them, pretty much all major conflicts have been men dying while women stay home. So this is an age old issue.

No what we're talking about here is the female privilege at play where the men are forced to stay, fight and die and the women have the freedom to flee and live elsewhere.

I actually agreed this was unfair multiple times in a previous thread. I don't blame you for not having read it, but yeah I never disagreed with this take.

We're merely bringing up the sheer selfishness of some of these women. not all, because we've already gone over the women that have VOLUNTARILY stayed back

Again, I have never disagreed with this either. I was saying that people have to make money and OF can pay big, AND the demand promotes the supply. Selfish people gonna selfish no matter what, but we can try to avoid the normalisation of this type of work by denormalising the practice of its consumption. And I think that's a male issue to address.

[–]AmuseDeath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, I went off course. I see that you're an ally. So apologies for a strong response when we're in agreement.

My main point is that this current discussion is about the context of OF, not OF itself which was my original point. OF is OF and you are right, it has to do with the demand from desperate men. My point was to emphasize that it's egregious when we bring up the topic of war.

[–]selectedtext 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Maybe if tigers tap danced.

Solving a problem involves presenting ideas that might actually happen.

[–]drbirtles 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Stop buying it. Get free porn on internet.

[–]selectedtext -1 points0 points  (1 child)

I've never paid for porn, ever, and if I chose to look at porn there is plenty plastered around the internet for free. Or I could ask your mom for a pic.

[–]drbirtles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My mom learnt everything she knows from your mom's course. Always best to consult the professionals.

[–]Inevitable_PC1740138 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But don't you guys know that these "OF Warriors" are also "fighting, suffering and sacrificing" for the war in Ukraine?

[–]mr_j_12 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I remember when jinjer were in australia for a festival tatiana was going on a rant about the war while her male bandmates were on stage, exempt from the war due to "spreading ukranian arts". If you care about the war, head home and fight.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is why I opt out of women. I chose to seek twinks and femboys for my needs. I no longer need to rely on gate keeping by women for sex and control. We all make choices and trade offs. I know this isn’t for everyone.

[–]Upper-Divide-7842 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have a problem with the male only draft. I have a problem with ingrate women who do not recognise the privilege of not being forced into war. 

I do not have a problem with women doing only fans if they want to pursue that line of work. It is literally none of my business. If you have such a problem with OF then talk to the men who pay for that content. 

I don't. Porn is free on the internet. But what other people do with their bodies and money is their business. 

[–]Current_Finding_4066 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As long as men are forced onto fronlines to get killed or maimed, I have think wen resorting to OF is not nearly as serious problemm

[–]CityoftheWolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Front lines"

[–]FriendOpen8251 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ukrainian Onlycans hoebags are posting 'luxe life' and stuff like that while their countrymen are getting chewed up and living in misery. The women didn't 'turn to being hoebags' they wanted this outcome and never think of their country. I served in the military when I was young but I'd never do it again because I wouldm't protect the women of my western country.

[–]UbiquitousWobbegong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, a little of column a, a little of column b? There aren't always jobs in foreign economies to absorb refugees. Sometimes it's a choice to pursue sex work, other times it's desperation.

It's the same with how prostitution has always boomed in war time. Some women have other options, some don't. 

OF in particular is in this sweet spot where it can be particularly lucrative even by western standards, so women are doing it just for that reason sometimes. But I can't blame refugees of war for turning to OF when western women who have much better options are doing the exact same thing. What's their excuse.

[–]Arcadian1815 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All im saying is I get it. Since we were living in caves men have been using their strength to survive and women have been using their sexuality to survive. This is just human nature.

[–]throwaway294901 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Geez I wonder who's subscribing to these women

[–]Dismal_Code_2470 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Most untrained women will be burden to the army , unlike untrained men , they will would be helpful