×
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fffgfggfffffff 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Don’t we want to stop war from both sides?

War aren’t started by average men .

Average men are fighting other country’s average men to benefits the leader and upper class.

Leaders make decisions without asking what majority of population want all the time , that is 300millions of people in united states .

Upper class want to benefit themselves ,they care less about your average men .

I don’t think any problem can be resolved by war ,except when food and needed resources are scarce , and that means the rich and upper class are starving too.

average men of country X , fighting average men from country Y , both countries leaders chilling in their palace ,with their wives discussing how to fight a war ,

can not solve any problems for average men and women

Stop allowing your men to fight war they didn’t start and won’t benefit from.

War was never started by average men , but by those with power like kings and female rulers.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

War is necessary, there are not enough resources for everyone and someone will always want whats yours.

[–]Bugibom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is one of those arguments that sounds "realistic" on paper but it actually is just defeatist. Do you have a cap on how large a peaceful human community can get ? We have countries with more than billion people that live in with a centralized autorithy. These countries internal regions have vastly different resources yet they can be at peace with a central governing body. So what is the cap if they were 2 billion would it break up ?